Sanction regime

Sanction regime

Screening 

For client due diligence as well as reporting purposes, reporting entities are required to consult sanction lists containing individuals, entities and legal persons, which are subject to freezing measures. A distinction is made between the United Nations Security Council Resolutions containing sanctions (UN lists) and the European Union (EU) sanction lists.

The UN, the EU and the national (Aruban) sanction lists are accessible through consolidated lists. Below you will find the links to these consolidated lists:

Objective Unusual Transaction Reporting (indicator 130102)

Article 2, paragraph 1, section b, of the Regulation Indicators Unusual Transactions provides that reporting entities are required to report transactions performed by or for the benefit of natural persons, legal persons, groups and entities which are listed on a:

Sanctions State Ordinance 2006 (AB 2007 no.24) accepted list:

The ISIL (Da’esh) & Al-Qaida Sanction List, and the UN Taliban List.

List designated by the head of FIU-Aruba:

These lists usually concern updates to the national (Aruban) sanction list and EU sanction lists. The FIU also designates lists based on several factors, e.g. by applying an anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing and counter proliferation financing (AML/CFT/CPF) risk-based approach. Furthermore, national developments in the sanctions regime as well as international developments that (might) directly affect Aruba are considered relevant factors when determining whether to designate a sanction list.

 

Overview of the designated lists by the Head of FIU-Aruba:

Subjective Unusual Transaction Reporting (indicator 130201/130202)

When a person, legal person, group or entity is not listed on a sanction list for which objective reporting is required but is listed on another sanction list, the service provider must decide, based on the available red flags, whether the transaction should be reported subjectively.

Keep in mind that a listing on a sanction list is considered a strong indication of the unusual character of a transaction.

Subjective reporting of an unusual transaction is done under the indicators:

Guidance on reporting unusual transactions in relation to sanctions

A more in depth explanation on the reporting obligation of unusual transactions in relation to sanctions is provided in the document Sancties en de Meldplicht: Uitleg in Begrijpelijke Taal. More information is also provided on how sanction evasion can be detected.